666 "XTension was not shutdown properly"

[Charles Pendleton]

I can say that the only problem I experienced that has been a bit of a  
worry is that my LynXPorT was run-away.  The day after it was  
installed, I came home and nothing was working.  Looking at the log,  
there were nonstop "Data buffer overrun" messages from the mac.  This  
used to be a problem way back then Michael posted a Lynx fix that  
greatly minimized it.  I'm assuming (hopefully correctly), that this  
patch is already included in 666?

SInce then, it seems to be better; however, I have restarted the  
server once each of the past 3 days (for other reasons).

Best,
Charlie-


On Feb 27, 2008, at 1:28 PM, James Sentman wrote:

>
> On Feb 27, 2008, at 10:46 AM, Bill Husler wrote:
>
>> Hmmm,
>> I updated to the new build(666 running on a Leopard Server MacMini  
>> intel) over the week-end. This morning, I awoke to find that my  
>> morning script had not run. I checked on the XTension server and  
>> found that the server was up, but XTension was not running. I  
>> started it and it came up fine with this message added to the log.  
>> I happened to have left a targeting system running, but the log on  
>> it abruptly stopped about 15 minutes before my morning script  
>> should have run this morning. Thinking back, I think I found it not  
>> running one other time since upgrading, but I figured I just have  
>> just quit it by mistake. Could it be that build number after all?
>> Bill
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> Well thats certainly not right. I have had odd crashes rarely with  
> betas before this one, but I've been running 666 or precursors with  
> only minor changes here without any difficulty for some time. The  
> one thing I knew was sometimes causing difficulty is definitely  
> fixed, so this will be a new one.
>
> Any chance you can scare up a crash report?  You might find one in  
> the Console application if you look through the logs list and find  
> the crash reporter folder. Please mail that to me off the list if  
> you can find one.
>
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
>
> James Sentman                       http://sentman.com		http://MacHomeAutomation.com
>
>
>