(Complaint Received)

[Dean Davis]

Ah yes but the law only covers "unsolicited" commercial electronic email.
You subscribe to the list therefore you have solicited.

You are guilty of solicitation! :)

Dean


On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:40:18 -0800, Rob Lewis <rob at whidbey.com> wrote:
> But what about all those messages touting the benefits of the Skyway
> Racer?  :-)
> 
> On Feb 10, 2005, at 8:34 AM, Dean Davis wrote:
> 
> > As I suspected, this is the very first thing in Missouri's anti-spam
> > law...
> >
> > (1) "Commercial electronic mail", an electronic mail message sent for
> > the purpose of encouraging the purchase or rental of, or investment
> > in, property, goods, or services;
> >
> > The email on this list does not fit this definition therefore falls
> > outside the scope of the law.
> >
> > Dean Davis
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:32:52 -0500, Mark F. nettleingham
> > <markfn at commvault.com> wrote:
> >>    I  received a "Missouri" warning last night at about 6:30 PM from
> >> my
> >> "test reply". Hopefully, by removing most of the body for this post I
> >> will not receive another one.
> >>
> >>    Looking at Missouri's web site, if this is considered "commercial"
> >> mail we are in fact in violation of the law.
> >>
> >>   1. Requires senders of commercial e-mail to provide recipients with
> >>      the ability to opt out of receiving more and prohibits senders
> >>      from sending additional e-mail to those who have opted out.
> >>   2. Prohibits false or misleading transmission of information and
> >>      deceptive subject headings.
> >>   3. Requires physical address of sender be included in e-mail.
> >>
> >>    Does this spell the end of even opt-in mailing lists?
> >>
> >> Eric Galli wrote:
> >>
> >>> I got one a few months ago too. I think emails with links in them may
> >>> have something to do with it. Looks like a spam message to some
> >>> filter.
> >>>
> >>> -E-
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
>